Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02667
Original file (BC 2010 02667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02667 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect his three active duty tours 
of more than 90 days each in order for him to be eligible for 
Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He has three tours of over 90 consecutive days of active duty 
which are not showing in his military records. He served from 
January 1999 to May 1999 at Shaw Air Force Base (AFB), South 
Carolina; from September 1999 to December 1999 at Ali Al Salem 
Air Base, Kuwait; and he was activated and served from February 
2002 to July 2002 at Rhein Main Air Base, Germany. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of an 
award nomination, Supplemental Evaluation Sheet, and an award 
citation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the applicant’s NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau 
Report of Separation and Record of Service, he served from 
25 January 1996 to 14 June 2003 (7 years, 4 months, and 20 days) 
in the Illinois Air National Guard. He was progressively 
promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) with a date of rank 
of 21 September 2000. According to a DD Form 214, Certificate of 
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, provided by the applicant, 
he served from 23 February 2002 to 4 July 2002 on active duty in 
support of OPERATION JOINT FORGE, for a total of 4 months and 
12 days. 

 

ARPC/DPSVT contacted the applicant twice by email and once by 
letter requesting copies of orders or travel vouchers to support 
his request. In response, the applicant provided a DD Form 214 
for the period 23 February 2002 to 4 July 2002. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPSVT recommends denial. DPSVT states that based on the 
information provided by the applicant in his initial request, 
they were unable to verify evidence to support his request. 

 

The DPSVT complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant provided a 
copy of his DD Form 214 for the period 23 February 2002 to 4 July 
2002. 

 

A copy of the applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is 
at Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of error or injustice to provide partial relief. We 
note the applicant asserts he completed three tours of active duty 
over 90 days each to qualify for Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits; 
however, based on the evidence of record and the submitted 
documentation, he served only one tour of active duty over 90 days 
(23 February 2002 to 4 July 2002) subsequent to 11 September 2001. 
ARPC/DPSVN was able to confirm the applicant had a total of 145 
days of active duty service since 11 September 2001. This 
qualifies the applicant to apply to the Department of Veteran 
Affairs for Chapter 33, Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. Therefore, we 
recommend the records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he served on 
active duty from 23 February 2002 to 4 July 2002. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-02667 in Executive Session on 10 February 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-
02667 was considered: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Jul 10, w/atchs. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSVT, dated 1 Oct 10. 

Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 10. 

Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Oct 10, w/atch. 

 


 

 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01232

    Original file (BC-2010-01232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01232 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be reissued to incorporate multiple active duty tours from 22 Jun 71 through 21 Dec 71. On 30 Nov 06, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02888

    Original file (BC-2010-02888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02888 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with foreign service for serving in Germany and Japan. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03190

    Original file (BC-2010-03190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    D. Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). On 23 May 2011, ARPC/DPTSA advised the applicant that he is authorized the following medals and ribbons: Joint Service Achievement Medal, Air Force Good Conduct, Army Service Ribbon w/one device, Air Reserve Meritorious Service Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Air Force Longevity Medal w/three devices, Air Force Reserve Medal w/M device, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon w/one Silver Star and one Bronze Star,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02667

    Original file (BC-2012-02667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02667 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His former spouse be able to receive Retirement/TRICARE benefits. A review of the applicant’s record indicates he completed over 37 years of service for basic pay from 1975 through 2012; however, only 30 years and 3 months of this time was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02289

    Original file (BC-2010-02289.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02289 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02995

    Original file (BC-2010-02995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. to verify his deployment, the Board would reconsider his request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00595

    Original file (BC-2010-00595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Pakistan and in Afghanistan; however, his record only reflects his time in Afghanistan, not Pakistan. The complete ARPC/DPSVT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04096

    Original file (BC-2012-04096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02620

    Original file (BC-2003-02620.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 August 1999 he signed and returned a completed ARPC Form 123 - Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, electing Option C - Immediate Annuity for spouse and child. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a response, with attachments, which is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02849

    Original file (BC 2014 02849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant admits that the error was on his part, but requests that the Board adjust the “date of submission” to his original date of Mar 13. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...